Sunday, December 19, 2004
The Den Of Dupes, Weasels, And Scoundrels Looks Out For One Of Their Own
It was a little more than a week ago that an orchestrated showing of confidence was made for U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan. The phony hypocrisy of the act annoyed me enough to hold a place in my memory among the years best examples of nonsense in Left-land.
Imagine the excitement. Kofi Annan recently received a standing ovation from fellow U.N. “diplomats [socialist bureaucrats].” Several world leaders and Americans of like political views also showed their support ("yay team!").
We're supposed to believe that Annan is now the poor victim of calls to resign by evil American right wing / Bush types (even though the Bush administration itself is giving Annan a pass).
Annan has a clear history of inaction and lack of interest toward acts of tyranny and genocide. He has overseen the corrupt actions of an unelected bureaucracy that has bilked innocents of dignity (and billions of dollars in food) and turned a blind eye to the actions of ruthless dictators. He has also continued attempts to hinder any further investigation into U.N. corruption (of which there is plenty). He’s incompetent to say the least, and likely corrupt to the core.
What should we expect from an institution’s leadership that is technically accountable to no one yet continually demands more authority? Most of the “mainstream” media certainly take little interest in the perennial scandals that take place in this well financed soapbox for socialist polemic (FOX news being a rare exception). Only recently have most major news sources taken note at all. They, after all, don't like being "negative" (unless reporting on Bush, Iraq, the free-market, or America in general).
An Associated Press article I had read last week (sorry, I can’t find a link to it on the web) not only noted Annan’s support from fellow bureaucrats but also pointed out the last time a standing ovation was given to a “leader,” a gesture of defense for Bill Clinton, “when he was a beleaguered president under attack on the Monica Lewinsky case” (emphasis mine).
Another entrenched media constructed myth; poor Bill Clinton was supposedly hounded for a mere tryst with an intern. In fact, aside from the tacky disgrace to a public institution (the Presidency), Clinton was heavily involved in an entire syndrome of corruptions, not least being that of lying before a grand jury. His vices were mere icing on a criminal cake, but now the official line being reported to history is merely that of a persecuted president with an overactive libido.
So now, fast forward to another corrupt hero of the Left's vision, Kofi Annan. An assembly of unelected scoundrels, leaders in Europe, the Cuban government, and Vladimir Putin now circle the wagons to defend the cause of bureau-incompetence and corruption from attack by the evil force of those who dare question questionable behavior – give me a break.
A reposting of a link to a cartoon may be relevant to the current issue.
When President Bush last spoke before the Den of Scoundrels, he was met with a notable lack of support (and, of course, sublte derision). All that talk about freedom doesn't sit well in a chamber of bureau-thugs and statist demogogues.
A good overview of the UN's “shortcomings” can be found in a recent opinion in – surprisingly – The Los Angeles Times.
**************************
I haven’t yet read this book regarding U.N. misdeeds and incompetence but it also appears relevant to the issues at hand.
I’m glad there are a few people awake and honest enough to direct some critical attention to the world assembly of collectivist bureau-slime, in spite of the UN bureaucracy's attempts to silence them.
**************************
Random Observations
1.) It's funny that the left is so enraged that two power centers (the presidency and congress) have fallen into the control of Republicans. The irony is that those who attain power in these two institutions are voted for. The Left fails to note that unelected kindred spirits dominate schools, colleges, most mainstream media, entertainment and even the sciences and humanities. Oh yes, as an aside, until recent history, the Democrats controlled congress for the better part of forty years. Now they're all supposedly concerned about diverse views being able to "share power" -- Classic. They don't like the way many of us vote / they don't like the way many of us think. So, what else is new?
2.) Ever notice how the same people who admire and praise a country or group's special interest and "solidarity" with "their people” paradoxically despise common American citizen's patriotism or support for our own country. What's up with that?
**************************
Neal Boortz pointed out something of interest in TODAY'S NUZE (from Tuesday's post):
"Remember Mark and Denise Rich? Denise was a close pal of Bill Clinton. Mark was her crooked husband. Somehow Denise managed to snuggle up to Clinton and get a pardon for her husband during Clinton's final days in office. Now we're finding out that almost as soon as Bill Clinton pardoned Mark Rich he was off to the Middle East to become one of Saddam's partners in defrauding the American people and starving [Saddam's] people. Do you think that Clinton will ever be brought to task for this particular pardon? Are you kidding?"
***********************
Jimmy -- "malaise" -- Carter of the "non-partisan" Carter Center, has expressed his misgivings about Iraqi elections next month. This is the same guy whose optimistic pro-freedom attitude (I'm joking) left Iran in the hands of the tyrants that rule over it today. Carter truly has never met a dictator he didn't like. The weak-willed social Democrat is typically referred to in news articles as, "Nobel Peace Prize Winner"...and former President Jimmy Carter. You probably remember the Nobel Prize committee awarding him the Peach Prize (deliberate mispelling) as a symbolic insult to the Bush administration -- who we all know is, "worse than Hitler."
It's good to know that Carter is still the anti-U.S. doom and gloom clown that he was during his fifteen minutes of fame and public incompetence. In his eyes, all hopes for progress in Iraq are futile -- no use even having elections.
Some things and some people never change. What an idiot...
Another post in about five days or so...
Imagine the excitement. Kofi Annan recently received a standing ovation from fellow U.N. “diplomats [socialist bureaucrats].” Several world leaders and Americans of like political views also showed their support ("yay team!").
We're supposed to believe that Annan is now the poor victim of calls to resign by evil American right wing / Bush types (even though the Bush administration itself is giving Annan a pass).
Annan has a clear history of inaction and lack of interest toward acts of tyranny and genocide. He has overseen the corrupt actions of an unelected bureaucracy that has bilked innocents of dignity (and billions of dollars in food) and turned a blind eye to the actions of ruthless dictators. He has also continued attempts to hinder any further investigation into U.N. corruption (of which there is plenty). He’s incompetent to say the least, and likely corrupt to the core.
What should we expect from an institution’s leadership that is technically accountable to no one yet continually demands more authority? Most of the “mainstream” media certainly take little interest in the perennial scandals that take place in this well financed soapbox for socialist polemic (FOX news being a rare exception). Only recently have most major news sources taken note at all. They, after all, don't like being "negative" (unless reporting on Bush, Iraq, the free-market, or America in general).
An Associated Press article I had read last week (sorry, I can’t find a link to it on the web) not only noted Annan’s support from fellow bureaucrats but also pointed out the last time a standing ovation was given to a “leader,” a gesture of defense for Bill Clinton, “when he was a beleaguered president under attack on the Monica Lewinsky case” (emphasis mine).
Another entrenched media constructed myth; poor Bill Clinton was supposedly hounded for a mere tryst with an intern. In fact, aside from the tacky disgrace to a public institution (the Presidency), Clinton was heavily involved in an entire syndrome of corruptions, not least being that of lying before a grand jury. His vices were mere icing on a criminal cake, but now the official line being reported to history is merely that of a persecuted president with an overactive libido.
So now, fast forward to another corrupt hero of the Left's vision, Kofi Annan. An assembly of unelected scoundrels, leaders in Europe, the Cuban government, and Vladimir Putin now circle the wagons to defend the cause of bureau-incompetence and corruption from attack by the evil force of those who dare question questionable behavior – give me a break.
A reposting of a link to a cartoon may be relevant to the current issue.
When President Bush last spoke before the Den of Scoundrels, he was met with a notable lack of support (and, of course, sublte derision). All that talk about freedom doesn't sit well in a chamber of bureau-thugs and statist demogogues.
A good overview of the UN's “shortcomings” can be found in a recent opinion in – surprisingly – The Los Angeles Times.
I haven’t yet read this book regarding U.N. misdeeds and incompetence but it also appears relevant to the issues at hand.
I’m glad there are a few people awake and honest enough to direct some critical attention to the world assembly of collectivist bureau-slime, in spite of the UN bureaucracy's attempts to silence them.
1.) It's funny that the left is so enraged that two power centers (the presidency and congress) have fallen into the control of Republicans. The irony is that those who attain power in these two institutions are voted for. The Left fails to note that unelected kindred spirits dominate schools, colleges, most mainstream media, entertainment and even the sciences and humanities. Oh yes, as an aside, until recent history, the Democrats controlled congress for the better part of forty years. Now they're all supposedly concerned about diverse views being able to "share power" -- Classic. They don't like the way many of us vote / they don't like the way many of us think. So, what else is new?
2.) Ever notice how the same people who admire and praise a country or group's special interest and "solidarity" with "their people” paradoxically despise common American citizen's patriotism or support for our own country. What's up with that?
Neal Boortz pointed out something of interest in TODAY'S NUZE (from Tuesday's post):
"Remember Mark and Denise Rich? Denise was a close pal of Bill Clinton. Mark was her crooked husband. Somehow Denise managed to snuggle up to Clinton and get a pardon for her husband during Clinton's final days in office. Now we're finding out that almost as soon as Bill Clinton pardoned Mark Rich he was off to the Middle East to become one of Saddam's partners in defrauding the American people and starving [Saddam's] people. Do you think that Clinton will ever be brought to task for this particular pardon? Are you kidding?"
Jimmy -- "malaise" -- Carter of the "non-partisan" Carter Center, has expressed his misgivings about Iraqi elections next month. This is the same guy whose optimistic pro-freedom attitude (I'm joking) left Iran in the hands of the tyrants that rule over it today. Carter truly has never met a dictator he didn't like. The weak-willed social Democrat is typically referred to in news articles as, "Nobel Peace Prize Winner"...and former President Jimmy Carter. You probably remember the Nobel Prize committee awarding him the Peach Prize (deliberate mispelling) as a symbolic insult to the Bush administration -- who we all know is, "worse than Hitler."
It's good to know that Carter is still the anti-U.S. doom and gloom clown that he was during his fifteen minutes of fame and public incompetence. In his eyes, all hopes for progress in Iraq are futile -- no use even having elections.
Some things and some people never change. What an idiot...
Another post in about five days or so...
